Samsung‘s latest Galaxy Watch 3 blends high-end technology with a traditional design that most will find familiar. Although the sporty looks and matching capabilities of Garmin’s Vivoactive 4 might make things a bit more competitive. The Galaxy Watch 3 has a lot in common with the Apple Watch 5, making it among the most handy wearables currently available on the market.

With its fitness-tracking features and ample processing power, Samsung’s latest smartwatch is capable enough to stand on its own, without the help of a smartphone. On the other hand, the Garmin Vivoactive 4 has tons of features as well, but its design aesthetics and fitness-focused capabilities cater more to fitness buffs than casual wearers. While both watches might not be carrying Qualcomm’s most powerful smartwatch processor, they still pack enough features expected from next-generation wearables.

SCREENRANT VIDEO OF THE DAY

The Galaxy Watch 3 specs reveals the same Exynos 9110 dual-core processor, 360 x 360 resolution AMOLED display, and 340 mAh battery capacity, found in last year’s Galaxy Watch Active 2, albeit with a bigger 8GB internal storage. Of course, the biggest changes are its updated operating system, new software features and finally, the addition of an electrocardiogram sensor. As for Garmin’s Vivoactive 4, its data sheet shows a lower 260 x 260 resolution display and no ECG or any optical heart rate sensors. However, its variety of fitness trackers tries to make up for whatever it’s lacking in the hardware department. For example, a buyer will get pre-loaded exercise regimens, a built-in GPS sports apps, and an option to pick among top-level athletes as a personal coach.

Galaxy Watch 3 Vs. Vivoactive 4: Similarities & Advantages

Just like the Apple Watch 5 and Oppo Watch, both Samsung and Garmin smartwatch models carry matching 5ATM water-resistance, offering immersion up to 50 meters, making them suitable for swimming. Of course, The Galaxy Watch 3’s LTE capabilities makes it less dependent on smartphones, compared to the Vivoactive 4 which still heavily relies on its connectivity to a phone for media and messaging. The classy looks and rotating-bezel design and health monitors also makes Samsung’s offering better-suited for casual use.

See also  The 12 Best Two-Player Card Games

While the Galaxy Watch 3 has some decent running metrics and fitness apps, Garmin’s is still the more activity-oriented device. With a sleep monitor that determines optimal condition, Pulse Ox sensor for blood oxygen saturation tracking, and a host of customizable workouts, the Vivoactive 4 is the more appealing option for serious athletes. Despite their contrasting specialties, both the Samsung and Garmin smartwatches are still capable enough to be considered as some of the best Apple Watch alternatives to date.

Source: Samsung, Garmin

Scrat Finally Gets The Acorn In Last-Ever Short From Ice Age Studio

About The Author


Kyle Encina
(293 Articles Published)

Kyle Encina is a writer with over five years of professional experience, covering topics ranging from viral entertainment news, politics and movie reviews to tech, gaming and even cryptocurrency. During his free time, he indulges in composing melodies, listening to inspiring symphonies, physical activities, writing fictional fantasies (stories) and of course, gaming like a madman!

More From Kyle Encina